![]() ![]() But… is it good? Was it good actually? Did it historically make sense? Let’s find out. ( please note that my knowledge of British tank details is nowhere near Listy’s, so I will not be going into too much detail and will get naming conventions probably wrong at some point, that however should not invalidate the general principles of the accusation)Ĭhurchill is possibly the best known British heavy tank and one of the iconic vehicles of the British tree in World of Tanks. Was Churchill a good tank design, or was it in fact a piece of (s)crap? I post both arguments at the same time and then there will be a poll about who is right and YOU, the people, will decide: He doesn’t know what I am going to write either (of course, based on the argument, we both have a rough idea about the matter though). I do not know what he is going to write and I won’t know until I open his e-mail. Listy is going to write his “defense” and send it to me for publication in this very same post. I am going to write a text (an “accusation”) about my opinion on the Churchill and why it wasn’t a good tank design. So, here’s how it’s going to work – the rules: Listy, the British fan he is – of course started to defend the Churchill and from this discussion came an idea – let’s make it a trial and let YOU, the people, decide. About a week ago, we had a bit of an Skype conversation with David “Listy” Lister – just some friendly jabs from my side about the Churchill not being exactly a stellar design. ![]() First, a quick explanation what this post will be about. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |